Blockchains / SKALE
SKL

SKALE

SKL

Ethereum-native elastic blockchain network with zero gas fees for users

Layer 2 ethereumelasticgaming
Launched
2020
Founder
Jack O'Holleran, Stan Kladko
Website
skale.space
Primitives
3

Introduction to SKALE

SKALE Network provides an unusual scaling solution for Ethereum: elastic sidechains that offer zero gas fees for end users. Rather than a single Layer 2, SKALE creates a network of configurable chains that applications can spin up according to their needs—blockchain-as-a-service with Ethereum security.

The “zero gas” model—where applications pre-pay for user transactions—removes a major friction point for mainstream adoption. This approach has attracted gaming projects in particular, where frequent transactions and microtransactions make per-transaction fees impractical. SKALE uses smart contracts for its core functionality.

How SKALE Works

Elastic Sidechains

Network architecture:

  • Multiple configurable chains
  • Application-specific options
  • Ethereum-connected
  • On-demand scaling

Zero Gas for Users

Economic model:

  • Applications pay subscription
  • Users transact free
  • Pre-funded gas
  • Friction removed

SKALE Manager

Orchestration:

  • Chain provisioning
  • Validator assignment
  • Resource allocation
  • Network coordination

Technical Specifications

MetricValue
TypeElastic Sidechains
EVMFully compatible
User GasZero
Chain TypesSmall/Medium/Large
SecurityEthereum-based

The SKL Token

Utility

SKL serves multiple purposes:

  • Staking: Network security
  • Chain Access: Subscription payments
  • Governance: Protocol decisions
  • Delegation: Stake delegation

Tokenomics

Economic model:

  • Subscription fees
  • Staking rewards
  • Inflationary emission
  • Ecosystem incentives

Staking

Participation:

  • Delegated staking
  • Validator selection
  • Reward distribution
  • Network security

Chain Types

Configuration Options

Chain sizes:

  • Small: Basic applications
  • Medium: Moderate throughput
  • Large: High performance
  • Custom configurations

Application-Specific

Per-app chains:

  • Dedicated resources
  • Predictable performance
  • No competition
  • Custom parameters

Zero Gas Economics

How It Works

Fee model:

  • Apps subscribe to chain
  • Pay in SKL tokens
  • Users transact free
  • Fixed cost structure

Why It Matters

User experience:

  • No wallet funding needed
  • No fee anxiety
  • Mainstream-friendly
  • Gaming-suitable

Trade-offs

Considerations:

  • App subsidizes users
  • Business model needed
  • Spam potential
  • Resource management

Gaming Focus

Target Sector

Primary market:

  • Gaming applications
  • Frequent transactions
  • Microtransactions
  • User experience critical

Gaming Partners

Ecosystem projects:

  • Various game studios
  • NFT gaming
  • Web3 games
  • Entertainment focus

Why Gaming Works

Alignment:

  • Zero gas essential
  • High transaction volume
  • User experience priority
  • Monetization alternatives

Ethereum Integration

Security Model

Connection to Ethereum:

  • Staking on Ethereum
  • SKALE Manager on L1
  • Validator economics
  • Security inheritance

Bridge Infrastructure

Asset transfers:

  • ETH and ERC-20s
  • Bridge contracts
  • Token portability
  • Ecosystem connectivity

Competition and Positioning

vs. Other L2s

L2TypeUser GasFocus
SKALEElastic sidechainsZeroGaming
ArbitrumOptimistic rollupLowGeneral
PolygonVariousLowGeneral
ImmutableApplication-specificLowGaming

SKALE Differentiation

Unique position:

  • Zero user gas
  • Application-specific chains
  • Elastic provisioning
  • Gaming optimization

Validator Network

Running Validators

Node operation:

  • Hardware requirements
  • SKL staking
  • Chain assignment
  • Reward earning

Delegation

Participation:

  • Delegate to validators
  • Earn rewards
  • Network contribution
  • Accessible staking

Challenges and Criticism

Sidechain Model

Security considerations:

  • Not a rollup
  • Different security assumptions
  • Validator dependency
  • Trade-offs exist

Adoption

Growth challenges:

  • Many L2 options
  • Developer attention
  • Network effects
  • Competition

Complexity

Understanding barriers:

  • Elastic model unfamiliar
  • Configuration options
  • Integration requirements
  • Documentation needs

Recent Developments

Ecosystem Growth

Platform progress:

  • New applications
  • Gaming partnerships
  • Developer tools
  • Network expansion

Technical Updates

Protocol improvements:

  • Performance optimization
  • Feature additions
  • Security enhancements
  • Integration support

Future Roadmap

Development priorities:

  • Gaming: Sector focus
  • Ecosystem: Application growth
  • Performance: Optimization
  • Developer Tools: Better experience
  • Adoption: User acquisition

Conclusion

SKALE’s elastic sidechain model with zero user gas offers a genuinely differentiated approach to Ethereum scaling. The focus on gaming—where transaction frequency and user experience are paramount—represents smart market positioning.

The trade-off is a different security model than rollups, with applications trusting SKALE validators rather than inheriting full Ethereum security for every transaction. For many use cases, particularly gaming, this trade-off is acceptable.

For gaming developers seeking Ethereum-connected infrastructure without user gas friction and for applications that can benefit from dedicated chains, SKALE provides unique capabilities—though understanding the security model differences from rollups is important.