Blockchains / NEAR Protocol
NEA

NEAR Protocol

NEAR

Sharded, developer-friendly blockchain focused on usability and AI applications

Layer 1 user-friendlyaisharding
Launched
2020
Founder
Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov
Website
near.org
Primitives
3

Introduction to NEAR Protocol

NEAR Protocol distinguishes itself through an unwavering focus on usability - both for developers building applications and users interacting with them. Founded by Illia Polosukhin (co-author of the “Attention is All You Need” paper that introduced transformers) and Alexander Skidanov, NEAR launched in 2020 with innovations like human-readable account names, predictable gas costs, and a sharded architecture called Nightshade.

The protocol has gained attention for its AI initiatives, leveraging co-founder Polosukhin’s background in machine learning. NEAR’s combination of technical innovation and user experience focus positions it as a platform for mainstream blockchain adoption.

The NEAR Approach

User Experience Focus

NEAR prioritizes accessibility:

Named Accounts: “alice.near” instead of “0x7f3e…” Predictable Fees: Developers can cover user gas costs Progressive Onboarding: Users can start without wallets Familiar Experience: Web2-like interactions

Developer Experience

Building on NEAR is streamlined:

  • JavaScript/TypeScript SDK
  • Rust smart contracts
  • Familiar development patterns
  • Quick iteration cycles

How NEAR Works

Nightshade Sharding

NEAR’s sharding approach:

Dynamic Sharding: Network adjusts shard count based on demand State Sharding: Each shard maintains portion of state Transaction Sharding: Cross-shard transactions handled automatically Validator Rotation: Validators assigned to shards randomly

Thresholded Proof of Stake

NEAR’s Proof of Stake variant:

  • Validators selected by stake
  • Slashing for misbehavior
  • Delegation supported
  • Era-based rewards

Cross-Shard Communication

Transactions spanning shards:

  • Receipts pass between shards
  • Asynchronous execution
  • Eventual consistency
  • Transparent to users

Technical Specifications

MetricValue
Block Time~1 second
Finality~2 seconds
ConsensusNightshade PoS
TPS1,000+ (scales with shards)
Contract LanguageRust, JavaScript
Shards4+ (dynamic)

Key Innovations

Account Model

Unlike most blockchains:

  • Human-readable names (not just hashes)
  • Account-level access keys
  • Multiple keys per account
  • Named sub-accounts (app.alice.near)

Meta Transactions

Enabling gasless interactions:

  • Relayers submit transactions
  • Applications pay for users
  • Removes onboarding friction
  • Similar experience to Web2

Fungible/Non-Fungible Token Standards

Native standards:

  • NEP-141 (fungible tokens)
  • NEP-171 (NFTs)
  • Built-in royalties
  • Composable standards

The NEAR Token

Utility

NEAR serves multiple purposes:

  • Transaction Fees: Pay for computation and storage
  • Staking: Secure the network
  • Storage Staking: Pay for on-chain data
  • Contract Deployment: Deploy applications

Tokenomics

  • Total Supply: 1 billion NEAR
  • Inflation: ~5% annually
  • Distribution: Foundation, community, team
  • Gas fee burning: 70% of fees burned

Ecosystem Development

DeFi Protocols

Growing DeFi ecosystem:

  • Ref Finance: Leading DEX
  • Burrow: Lending protocol
  • Meta Pool: Liquid staking
  • Linear Protocol: Synthetic assets

AI and Machine Learning

NEAR’s AI focus:

  • NEAR AI: Research and development arm
  • Chain Abstraction: AI-powered UX
  • Agent Infrastructure: AI agent deployment
  • Founder Background: Transformer paper co-author

Aurora

EVM compatibility layer:

  • Deploy Solidity contracts
  • Use Ethereum tooling
  • NEAR security
  • Bridge to Ethereum

Chain Abstraction Vision

Beyond Multi-Chain

NEAR’s vision for abstracting away chains:

  • Users don’t need to know which chain they’re on
  • Seamless cross-chain transactions
  • Single account across networks
  • AI-powered routing

Key Components

BOS (Blockchain Operating System): Frontend framework for multi-chain apps Chain Signatures: Sign transactions on any chain Account Aggregation: One identity, many chains

Competition and Positioning

vs. Ethereum

AspectNEAREthereum
ShardingLiveRoadmap
Account NamesNativeENS required
TPS1,000+~15 (L1)
Developer UXFocus areaImproving

vs. Solana

AspectNEARSolana
ArchitectureShardedMonolithic
LanguageRust/JSRust
Account ModelNamedPublic key
Finality~2 seconds~12 seconds

Challenges and Criticism

Ecosystem Size

  • Smaller TVL than competitors
  • Fewer applications
  • Developer adoption growing but limited

Sharding Complexity

  • Cross-shard transactions add latency
  • Complex state management
  • Potential edge cases

Competition

  • Many L1s competing for developers
  • L2s offering similar benefits
  • AI narrative crowded

Recent Developments

Statelessness

Moving toward stateless validation:

  • Validators don’t need full state
  • Lower hardware requirements
  • Improved decentralization

NEAR DA

Data availability layer:

  • Support for rollups
  • Lower cost than Ethereum
  • Modular blockchain stack

AI Initiatives

Expanding AI focus:

  • NEAR AI research
  • Agent infrastructure
  • AI-powered applications

Future Roadmap

Development priorities include:

  • Full Sharding: Complete Nightshade rollout
  • Chain Abstraction: Seamless multi-chain UX
  • AI Integration: Agent infrastructure
  • Statelessness: Reduced validator requirements
  • Ecosystem Growth: Developer and user acquisition

Conclusion

NEAR Protocol’s focus on usability addresses real barriers to blockchain adoption. The combination of human-readable accounts, meta transactions, and familiar development patterns creates a more accessible platform than many competitors.

The AI angle, backed by co-founder Polosukhin’s credentials, adds a compelling narrative as the industry explores AI-blockchain intersection. The chain abstraction vision offers a path beyond the current fragmented multi-chain reality.

For developers seeking user-friendly blockchain infrastructure and for users frustrated by crypto’s complexity, NEAR offers a thoughtful alternative. The coming years will reveal whether technical excellence and user focus can translate into ecosystem growth sufficient to compete with more established platforms.