Primitives / Liquid Staking
DeFi Blockchain Primitive

Liquid Staking

Protocols that issue tradeable tokens representing staked assets

What is Liquid Staking?

Liquid staking protocols allow users to stake their tokens while receiving a liquid, tradeable token in return. Instead of locking assets in staking contracts with long unbonding periods, users receive derivative tokens (LSTs - Liquid Staking Tokens) that represent their staked position plus accumulated rewards. These LSTs can be used in DeFi, sold, or transferred while the underlying assets continue earning staking rewards.

How Liquid Staking Works

Basic Mechanism

  1. User deposits native token (ETH, SOL, etc.)
  2. Protocol stakes tokens with validators
  3. User receives liquid staking token (stETH, mSOL, etc.)
  4. LST accrues value from staking rewards
  5. User can redeem for underlying + rewards

Token Types

Two main models:

Rebasing Tokens (stETH):

  • Balance increases daily
  • 1 stETH always equals underlying claim
  • Rewards reflected in token quantity

Reward-Bearing Tokens (rETH):

  • Balance stays constant
  • Exchange rate increases
  • Rewards reflected in higher redemption value

Major Protocols

Ethereum

Leading LST providers:

  • Lido (stETH): Largest, ~30% of staked ETH
  • Rocket Pool (rETH): Decentralized operator set
  • Coinbase (cbETH): Institutional/retail
  • Frax (sfrxETH): Two-token model
  • Mantle (mETH): Ecosystem LST

Solana

Solana liquid staking:

  • Marinade (mSOL): Largest
  • Jito (JitoSOL): MEV rewards included
  • Lido (stSOL): Multi-chain expansion
  • Blaze (bSOL): Community focused

Other Chains

Multi-chain presence:

  • Cosmos: Stride, pSTAKE
  • Polygon: Lido, Stader
  • Avalanche: Benqi
  • Various chain-specific protocols

Benefits of Liquid Staking

Capital Efficiency

Unlock staked value:

  • Use LSTs in DeFi
  • Earn staking + DeFi yields
  • No opportunity cost
  • Better capital utilization

Liquidity

Tradeable position:

  • Sell without unstaking
  • Transfer easily
  • Use as collateral
  • Avoid unbonding periods

Accessibility

Lower barriers:

  • No 32 ETH minimum (Ethereum)
  • No validator operation needed
  • Simple user experience
  • Professional management

DeFi Integration

Composability:

  • Collateral on Aave, Compound
  • LP on Curve, Uniswap
  • Restaking on EigenLayer
  • Yield strategies

Risks

Smart Contract Risk

Protocol vulnerabilities:

  • Contract bugs
  • Upgrade risks
  • Oracle failures
  • Composability exploits

Depeg Risk

Price deviation:

  • LSTs may trade below peg
  • Market stress amplifies
  • Liquidity matters
  • Redemption delays

Validator Risk

Operational concerns:

  • Slashing passed to holders
  • Operator performance
  • Validator selection
  • Centralization risk

Regulatory Risk

Legal uncertainty:

  • Securities classification unclear
  • Varies by jurisdiction
  • Could affect protocols
  • Monitoring required

LST Economics

Fee Structure

Protocol revenue:

  • Typically 5-10% of rewards
  • Covers operations
  • Validator commissions
  • Protocol treasury

Yield Comparison

Returns vs. native staking:

  • Slightly lower (protocol fees)
  • But capital efficient
  • Plus DeFi opportunities
  • Net often positive

Market Dynamics

Supply and demand:

  • Premium in high demand
  • Discount in stress
  • Arbitrage mechanisms
  • Redemption options

Centralization Concerns

The Lido Problem

Concentration issues:

  • Lido controls ~30% of staked ETH
  • Potential consensus influence
  • Single protocol risk
  • Governance power

Mitigations

Decentralization efforts:

  • Self-limit initiatives
  • DVT adoption
  • Multiple protocol competition
  • Operator diversity

Restaking and LSTs

LST Restaking

Additional utility:

  • Stake LSTs on EigenLayer
  • Earn additional yield
  • Secure other networks
  • Layered risk

Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs)

New category:

  • eETH (EtherFi)
  • ezETH (Renzo)
  • rsETH (Kelp)
  • Combines staking + restaking + liquidity

Use Cases

Yield Maximization

Stacking returns:

  • Stake ETH → stETH (4% APY)
  • LP stETH/ETH → trading fees
  • Farm LP rewards → additional tokens
  • Compound returns

Collateral

Lending and borrowing:

  • Deposit stETH as collateral
  • Borrow stablecoins
  • Earn staking while borrowing
  • Leverage exposure

Hedging

Risk management:

  • Maintain staking exposure
  • Sell LST to reduce position
  • Hedge with derivatives
  • Flexible positioning

The Future of Liquid Staking

Continued Growth

Trends:

  • More staked assets liquid
  • Better integration
  • More protocols
  • Lower fees

Innovation

Emerging developments:

  • DVT integration
  • Native protocol LSTs
  • Cross-chain LSTs
  • Institutional products

Regulatory Clarity

Evolving landscape:

  • SEC scrutiny ongoing
  • International differences
  • Compliance products
  • Legal frameworks developing

Conclusion

Liquid staking solved a fundamental tension in Proof of Stake: the choice between securing the network and using capital productively. By issuing liquid derivatives of staked assets, these protocols enable users to do both simultaneously. While risks around smart contracts, depeg scenarios, and centralization require attention, liquid staking has become essential DeFi infrastructure—and understanding LST mechanics is crucial for participating in modern blockchain ecosystems.

Related Primitives

staking proof of stake defi